The importance of the Student Voice

As generative AI continues to reshape education, the LSE-PKU Student Manifesto for Assessment in the Age of AI provides a thoughtful framework for integrating AI into teaching and assessments responsibly. At RM Compare, we believe our Adaptive Comparative Judgement (ACJ) platform aligns perfectly with the manifesto’s principles and calls to action, offering educators and students tools to enhance learning while maintaining academic integrity and creativity.

How RM Compare Aligns with the Manifesto Principles

1. Embracing Critical Thinking

RM Compare places human judgment at the heart of assessment, prioritising originality, deep conceptual understanding, and critical reflection. By comparing student work side-by-side, assessors focus on intellectual engagement rather than surface-level evaluation, ensuring that assessments foster genuine comprehension.

2. Transformative Learning Experiences

Assessment should be more than a test—it should be a learning opportunity. RM Compare supports this by enabling meaningful feedback and helping students understand what constitutes high-quality work. This approach aligns with the manifesto’s emphasis on formative and summative assessments as tools for personal growth.

3. Transparency and Ethical AI Collaboration

Our platform promotes transparency through detailed reporting on assessment decisions, fostering trust between educators and students. RM Compare complements teaching by supporting collaboration rather than replacing intellectual effort, ensuring ethical use of AI tools.

4. Personal Voice and Originality

The ACJ methodology highlights individual creativity and unique perspectives, focusing on qualitative comparisons rather than rigid criteria. This ensures that assessments reflect personal input and originality, in line with the manifesto’s call for assessments that amplify personal voices.

5. Skill Development Over Knowledge Reproduction

RM Compare encourages innovative assessment methods such as project-based evaluations, which emphasize transferable skills like problem-solving, analytical thinking, and collaboration—essential for preparing students for real-world professional environments.

6. Adaptive Assessment Approaches

Flexibility is key in modern education. RM Compare supports diverse item types—documents, videos, portfolios—and enables tailored assessments across disciplines. This adaptability meets the manifesto’s call for varied assessment methods suited to different fields of study.

7. Ensuring Equitable Access

RM Compare’s online accessibility ensures that schools can implement assessments without geographical or financial barriers, supporting equitable access to high-quality tools as emphasized in the manifesto.

8. Staff-Student Partnership in Co-Design

The collaborative nature of RM Compare allows educators and students to co-design assessment criteria through moderation sessions or feedback loops, fostering shared ownership of the evaluation process.

Supporting Calls to Action

The manifesto also calls upon institutions to rethink their approach to generative AI integration thoughtfully:

1. Thoughtful Restrictions on AI Use: RM Compare ensures that AI complements rather than replaces intellectual engagement.
2. Transparency in AI Use: Our reporting capabilities promote transparency by documenting assessment decisions clearly.
3. Equitable Access: RM Compare can be deployed across institutions consistently to prevent disparities.
4. Diverse Assessment Methods: By supporting various formats like video presentations or interdisciplinary projects, RM Compare enables educators to move beyond traditional exams when appropriate.

Conclusion

RM Compare embodies many of the principles outlined in the LSE-PKU Student Manifesto, fostering critical thinking, meaningful learning experiences, transparency, skill development, and equitable access to innovative assessment tools. Its flexibility and human-centered design make it an ideal partner for institutions seeking to integrate generative AI responsibly into education while maintaining academic integrity and inclusivity.

As generative AI becomes a staple in education, platforms like RM Compare will play a pivotal role in ensuring its responsible use—empowering educators and students alike to achieve their full potential while staying true to their values.