Interactive Charts in RM Compare Reporting
All Standard and Premium Reporting charts have powerful interactive features that allow you to interrogate your data.
All Standard and Premium Reporting charts have powerful interactive features that allow you to interrogate your data.
As educational priorities shift towards more reliable, fair, and insightful summative assessment, RM Compare is emerging as a transformative solution for both school groups and awarding bodies.
Assessment for learning (AfL) is about using assessment as a formative tool to support ongoing student development. RM Compare’s Adaptive Comparative Judgement (ACJ) technology enhances this process by embedding peer learning into assessment activities—making them more engaging, reflective, and impactful.
As digital transformation reshapes assessment, RM Compare stands out for its ability to turn assessment into a powerful learning experience.
As a session progresses there are several ways to view Items. It has not been easy however to view an item and understand where it is on the rank as the session is progressing, or at its conclusion......until now!
Assessing digitised 3D artefacts with Adaptive Comparative Judgement as of an ongoing school group project.
RM Compare sessions need to remain un-interrupted once they are running. Items cannot be removed or added. It is important therefore to ensure that all Items added to a session are carefully checked.
As one academic year draws (at least in this part of the world) to close we are reflecting on lessons learnt while continuing to work hard preparing for the next one.
How can lessons learnt from the innovative e-scape project help to facilitate a national education 'change' agenda in curriculum, pedagogy and assessment to empower teachers, learners and all stakeholders?
In the ever-evolving landscape of educational assessment, Adaptive Comparative Judgement (ACJ) continues to prove its worth as a powerful and flexible tool. A recent study by Jeffrey Buckley, published in the Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice journal, provides compelling evidence that further validates the effectiveness of ACJ ranks, particularly those generated by systems like RM Compare, as on-demand rulers for assessment purposes.
A common question we get asked concerns the reliability data shown in the standard reports. To understand the usefulness of this number it is worth stepping back a little to consider reliability as a concept and its relationship to validity in assessment session design.
How a simple intervention delivered improved learning outcomes in a study of 550 University students
Our monthly report is packed full of news about new product releases and the very latest research and opinion on all things Adaptive Comparative Judgement.