Interactive Charts in RM Compare Reporting
All Standard and Premium Reporting charts have powerful interactive features that allow you to interrogate your data.
All Standard and Premium Reporting charts have powerful interactive features that allow you to interrogate your data.
As educational priorities shift towards more reliable, fair, and insightful summative assessment, RM Compare is emerging as a transformative solution for both school groups and awarding bodies.
Assessment for learning (AfL) is about using assessment as a formative tool to support ongoing student development. RM Compare’s Adaptive Comparative Judgement (ACJ) technology enhances this process by embedding peer learning into assessment activities—making them more engaging, reflective, and impactful.
As digital transformation reshapes assessment, RM Compare stands out for its ability to turn assessment into a powerful learning experience.
Improved speed, efficiency and reliability reduces workload for staff while promoting greater fairness with more authentic assessments.
RM Compare can significantly enhance design thinking in higher and further education by providing a platform that supports the iterative, user-centered, and collaborative processes central to design thinking methodologies.
Adaptive Comparative Judgement (ACJ) has been increasingly recognized as a valuable tool for peer learning in higher and further education contexts
It is important that Judges can consider Items in a way that meets their personal preferences and needs. RM Compare works well on all major browsers and devices. It also offers a number of user controls in the interface.
Spring has sprung, the Human is in the Loop and bye-bye BETA! Another busy month passes for RM Compare with more exciting developments to follow.
Get more done with RM Compare Accelerators - faster, more predictable, and scalable. RM Compare Accelerators offer advanced functionality to the core RM Compare system. We develop them in direct response to the feedback we receive. Each service is designed to provide partners with the functionality they need to bring valuable, innovative solutions to their users and customers.
In the realm of design education, where creativity and innovation are paramount, assessing student work poses unique challenges. Traditional grading methods often struggle to capture the essence of students' creative output. Enter Adaptive Comparative Judgement (ACJ), a dynamic assessment method that promises a more nuanced approach.
Peer assessment has long been a valuable tool in the educational toolkit, offering students the chance to engage with the grading process and learn from their peers. But what happens when we strip away the traditional assessment criteria and dive into the world of comparative judgement?
This blog post delves into the key findings of some recent research using RM Compare, exploring how ACJ can revolutionize the feedback process and contribute to a more engaging and reflective learning environment.